Friday, June 6, 2014

Chemical Facility Safety & Security Working Group Issues Initial Status Report

In August 2013, President Barack Obama issued Executive Order (EO) 13650, Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security, with the goal of enhancing the safety and security of chemical facilities and reducing risks associated with hazardous chemicals. In response to the EO, a group of federal agencies including EPA, DOL, DHS, and the departments of Justice, Agriculture and Transportation worked collectively to identify ways to enhance agency coordination and information sharing; modernize policies, regulations, and standards to enhance safety and security in chemical facilities; and work with stakeholders to identify best practices to reduce safety and security risks in the production and storage of potentially harmful chemicals.

The Chemical Facility Safety and Security Working Group have issued an initial status report that summarizes its progress, focusing on actions to date, findings and lessons learned, challenges and priority next steps. View it here.

Evolution of Workplace Safety Yields Four Steps for Safe Work Environments

Post By Safety 2014 Guest Blogger Todd Hohn

As ASSE’s Safety 2014 quickly approaches, industry professionals can be reminded of the continuous evolution of safety precautions, regulations, and products. The impact of safety in the workplace has been great and will continue to improve through innovative products coupled with responsible procedures in the U.S. and globally.

The evolution (or as some would refer to it, “revolution”) of safety in the US has a long storied past marred with tragic and catastrophic events. Each one provides a unique perspective into how future events can be prevented if we take the time to learn from them. If time travel was a possibility, the past would show that safety started long before there were regulations. Some of the earliest examples of this involved Dr. Ramazzini who was known at the Father of Occupational Medicine. In 1700, he advised physicians to ask patients about their occupation when diagnosing disease, which led to the identification of specific occupational diseases for 52 different occupations. This was one of the first instances of a direct correlation between a person’s job and the impact it had on their body. In other words, the work we do may be dangerous!

In fact, the start of UL was based on this premise. People were being injured and killed, and structures were being burned and destroyed. These unfortunate occurrences were a result of electricity being introduced at the Chicago world's fair in 1893. Following the introduction, the protection of people and property from the hazards of electricity was the original purpose of UL. It has since evolved over the past 120 years to a mission of the promotion of safe living and working environments for people everywhere.

Turn the clock forward to the early 1900s to magnify another safety issue, and we start to paint a picture of deplorable working conditions for immigrant laborers working in the meat packing plants in Chicago. This was played out in The Jungle by Upton Sinclair, and it resulted in public outcry and, later, the creation of new laws and regulations for the food industry. In fact, many books on this topic were being written at this time, and, in turn, Americans were struggling with how much responsibility a workplace had in the safety of its employees.

Perhaps one of the most defining instances to provide clarity in workplace safety occurred in 1911: the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. It resulted in 146 garment workers dying from fire, smoke inhalation and jumping to their death in efforts to escape. Key notable factors that led to such a high death toll were the locked exit doors and stairwells. Originally designed to prevent workers from pilfering the garments that were being manufactured, the locked exit ways were detrimental in the number of fatalities. The Jungle affected the safety of the meatpacking industry, and it took the Triangle Shirtwaist fire to alter conditions of workplace safety for garment workers. The result was more stringent fire safety standards as well as the creation of organized workforces (in the form of unions) to drive improved working conditions for all garment workers.

Later that year, the American Society of Safety Engineers was created. This organization, along with the National Safety Council (formed in 1913), brought more awareness to workplace safety. Awareness led to more protection in the form of new laws and regulations, improved enforcement of the new laws and regulations, engineering, construction improvements, technology and training.

While there are many tragic events that could be referenced from the past, the crucial point to recognize is that incidents continue to occur. In the U.S., we are seeing record lows related to workplace accident rates and lower fatalities as a result. The continuation of bad events is inevitable, but each time they occur, they become a learning opportunity. For the U.S., the seriousness of accidents has become more and more severe and, as a result, the public gets upset, regulators respond and organizations improve (learning). Each time an event occurred, more attention was placed on workplace safety and healthy.

owever, of all the instances, there's typically one defining event that changes the course of history. For example, some would argue that it was the Triangle Shirtwaist fire in the U.S. Following that tragedy, epic changes in fire, electrical, life safety and building codes occurred that improved working conditions.

So, consider this question. Can emerging economies learn from the evolution of workplace safety in the U.S. over the last 100 years and accelerate their learning to minimize the death, destruction and tragedy associated with workplace accidents? I would argue they can, and we can use the evolution of workplace safety in the U.S. to chart that course.

To accelerate the process, the following things need to happen:
  • Be a leader. Just like any initiative, management needs to step up and drive the improvements. Leaders don’t surface by sitting back and waiting for regulations to drive improvements. Today's best companies are anchored by strong leaders who recognize if they simply comply, they will be average. If a company is average, people will still get hurt and possibly die. Leaders need to do more. In addition, fires will continue to occur, and it will be difficult to attract employees and maintain morale. Company production and, ultimately, company business will suffer.
  • Make yourself relevant. To build on the leadership component, strive for new standards of excellence in workplace safety and health. Companies can't afford to wait for regulations to be created in their country to be irrelevant; go see what other best companies have done and emulate them. Leverage these experts to create new internal standards around fire, life safety, construction, and prevention methods to drive improvements in workplace safety.
  • Engage third parties. Engage experts from third parties to help create internal standards around fire protection, electrical, life safety, building construction and workplace safety. In addition, use third parties to audit company facilities and compare findings with existing standards. These audits should be conducted unannounced and at regular intervals to ensure that expectations are met consistently.
  • Provide transparency. The best organizations manage with confidence and are not afraid to show how good they are. However, these companies are equally as honest about where improvements must be made. Knowing your business well enough to recognize gaps equates to a perception of competence within both your peer group and customer base. Provide this transparency to outside groups as well as internal communication channels to demonstrate where you are and what you still need to do to improve.
Four steps. Amazing! In 125+ years of rules and regulations and just plain “trying to get it right,” we can boil this down to just four steps. Admittedly, the steps to take are large. It may seem insurmountable at times to get every piece of this puzzle to work together to achieve operational and safety excellence. However, the world is once again at a crossroads as it relates to workplace safety and health.

As it occurred in 1911 after the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire or after the publishing of The Jungle, the calls for change are deafening. However, unlike those times, let’s lead this change as business leaders. Don’t wait. Be relevant. Be best in class. These are not “issues.” They are lives, and we all have a duty to protect people and property to the best of our abilities.

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Three Common Fall Protection Mistakes


An estimated 1 million workers and 25,000 businesses across the country are participating in fall protection training activities this week, June 2-6, as part of OSHA’s National Stand-Down on Falls in Construction. OSHA urges employers to take time this week to train workers on effective fall protection strategies and offers a certificate of participation to businesses participating in the stand-down.

As you prepare for any last-minute toolbox talks you may have scheduled for Friday, June 6, take a moment to consider these three common fall protection mistakes highlighted by Simplified Safety:

1) Failure to properly guard skylights. When working on roofs, skylights are often overlooked as a fall hazard. Their glass and plastic often cannot withstand the force of a falling person, and even protective caging around skylights may not be sufficiently strong. Workers can be protected from such hazards by using skylight protection screens or temporary railings.

2) Failure to guard an open roof hatch. Open roof hatches must be inspected for proper configuration. If the gate opens up to the edge of the roof, either the hatch must be turned around or a rail must be installed at the roof’s edge. Open roof hatches must also be protected using hatch rails that surround the entire assembly.

3) Failure to inspect gear every time. Harnesses must be checked prior to every use to ensure that stitching is intact, that no wear points are found in the nylon passing through the buckles and that no signs of damage are present around frequently used grommets. Self-retracting lifelines must also be checked to ensure the ability for full deployment and that the cable or nylon show no signs of wear. All equipment must be checked for grease, burns, cuts and fraying.

Read more here.

CSB Report Points to Blowout Preventer Failure in Deepwater Explosion


Photo by U.S. Coast Guard
The blowout preventer (BOP) that was intended to shut off the flow of high-pressure oil and gas from the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico during the disaster on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig on April 20, 2010, failed to seal the well because drill pipe buckled for reasons the offshore drilling industry remains largely unaware of. That's a key finding discussed in a two-volume draft investigation report released today by the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB).

CLICK HERE to access Overview

CLICK HERE to access Volume 1

CLICK HERE to access Volume 2

According to CSB, the BOP's failure directly led to the oil spill and contributed to the severity of the incident on the rig. The CSB will meet later today to consider the draft report for approval. A webcast of the meeting begins at 4 p.m. CDT today.

The CSB report concludes that the pipe buckling likely occurred during the first minutes of the blowout, as crews tried to regain control of oil and gas surging up from the well. The report indicates that the BOP’s blind shear ram – an emergency hydraulic device with two sharp cutting blades, intended to seal an out-of-control well – likely activated on the night of the disaster. However, the pipe buckling that likely occurred on the night of April 20 prevented the blind shear ram from functioning properly. Instead of cleanly cutting and sealing the well’s drill pipe, the shear ram actually punctured the buckled, off-center pipe, sending huge additional volumes of oil and gas surging toward the surface and initiating the 87-day-long oil and gas release into the Gulf that defied multiple efforts to bring it under control.

"The identification of the new buckling mechanism for the drill pipe ­– called 'effective compression'– was a central technical finding of the draft report," CSB states. "Under certain conditions, the 'effective compression' phenomenon could compromise the proper functioning of other blowout preventers still deployed around the world at offshore wells. The complete BOP failure scenario is detailed in an 11-minute computer video animation the CSB developed and released along with the draft report.

Learn more about the draft reports on the CSB website.

Little Giant Offers Free Ladder Safety Resources

Did you know that one person every day dies in a ladder incident? This may be surprising, but every day, 2,000 people are injured while using ladders and 100 suffer permanent disability. Manufacturer Little Giant Ladder Systems says that instead of hiding from these statistics, it is embracing them to do something to help.

In recognition of National Safety Month, the company has launched a series of ladder safety resources, including free safety training, social media platforms and educational tools to help prevent these fatalities and debilitating injuries. The company's resources include:


"Little Giant’s overriding goal is to prevent injuries and save lives," says Ryan Moss, CEO of Little Giant Ladder Systems and Vice President of the American Ladder Institute. "Moving one person off that injury and death list, saving one life—that is what gets us up in the morning and helps us sleep at night. We want to literally change the world, one ladder at a time."