Thursday, June 27, 2013

ASSE Officially Launches Risk Assessment Institute


ASSE has officially launched its Risk Assessment Institute to facilitate EHS inclusion in the organizational risk management process, allowing businesses to "proactively prioritize, resource, and mitigate risk in advance of injuries or catastrophe."

During the launch reception, ASSE President-Elect Kathy A. Seabrook, CSP, noted that EHS professionals are uniquely positioned to educate executives and the business community on issues related to proper risk assessment within the management process. "EHS professionals have the valued expertise and leadership to collaborate with senior managers in the implementation of effective risk assessment and the ongoing oversight of productive risk management," she said.

The institute will support improved risk-related training and education while providing a platform for the EHS community to contribute to the development of new evidence-based risk-related policies, processes and solutions. It will also serve as a clearinghouse for risk-related information and the tools relevant to professional SH&E.

"Recent injury and illness trends within companies and their global supply chains indicate that overall incident rate improvement has slowed and rates of fatal and serious injuries have remained steady for a number of years. Clearly, a different approach is required if further improvements are to be made," Seabrook said. "Now is the time for a transformation of safety leadership through proactive, preventive approaches that have the potential to identify risks and enable action in advance of injury, illness or loss."

Live From Safety 2013: Good Strategy, Bad Strategy

Post From Safety 2013 Guest Blogger Steve Minshall

UCLA professor and author Richard Rumelt delivered the Wednesday morning keynote address at Safety 2013. It was based on his study of strategy and his book Good Strategy Bad Strategy. If you’re interested, there is a pretty good review of Rumelt’s book by Jon Mertz here.

Rumelt began his comments by saying that wishful thinking is not a strategy. Similarly, as some have said, hope is not a strategy, either. While his remarks dealt primarily with the business world, EHS professionals can certainly recognize the wisdom of his words.

Rumelt gave examples of companies and individuals who thought they had a strategy but really had, in the good professor’s words “fluff."  His clearest example of a valid strategy was what Steve Jobs did years ago when Apple was failing. He reduced the product line from 14 down to one; he stopped making peripherals; he eliminated expensive talent that did not support the core business; and he took many more concrete steps. As Rumelt says, “This was just business 101.”

Jobs made tough choices after clearly diagnosing the problem(s), then he put in place a clear action plan. Apple made a dramatic turnaround. On the other hand, Rumelt described how General Motors was competing against itself in the 1920s. One man’s diagnosis of the problem and subsequent strategy eliminated overlapping models and pricing for GM and the company flourished. Until it didn’t. In 2009, GM filed for bankruptcy protection; its then-business model looked much like the one that was causing it to fail in the 1920s. Apparently, strategy doesn’t work if you don’t adhere to it.

Rumelt’s message was that strategy consists of what he calls the “kernel." The kernel consists of three elements: diagnosis, guiding policy and coherent action. That’s what Jobs used and GM did, too, for awhile.

Diagnosis is more than identifying the problem; it also includes developing an approach that can be followed to solve the problem. Guiding policy is not the action steps but more the “guardrails” that facilitate what needs to take place. Coherent action means aligning and coordinating the activities that fit within the guiding policy.

When it comes to SHE affairs, do you or your company have a strategy? Can you clearly explain, in your already prepared elevator speech, what your EHS strategy is? Can you and others easily list the guiding policy? Do the people who need to know understand what the required actions are to help you achieve your strategy?

If you’re not there yet, read Rumelt’s book and consider his advice to write down your strategy and the kernel elements and practice it on a particular situation that needs to be addressed. Be prepared to make the tough choices and, by all means, avoid the EHS fluff.

Safety 2013's Wednesday General Session was sponsored by SafeStart.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Safety 2013 Polls: Attendees Place Their Votes

Safety 2013 features live polling during its general sessions. Attendees submit their answers via text message and see results in real time. Here are the results of some recent polls taken at Safety 2013:

Have you downloaded the Safety 2013 app?
Yes: 65%
No: 35%

Are you ready for GHS implementation?
Yes: 60%
No: 25%
Not sure what it is: 15%

What's your favorite part of Safety 2013?
Expo: 17%
General sessions: 17%
Seeing friends and networking: 37%
Technical sessions: 29%

Influence: How to Get It & What to Gain From It

In this Safety 2013 session, John Henshaw, senior vice president of ChemRisk LLC, and Ed Foulke, both former OSHA administrators, discussed their views on influence, how to get it and how to use it.

As Henshaw recalled his early career at Monsanto, he admitted to sending a letter to a head executive about what he thought needed to be fixed within the company. He quickly learned that the way he was thinking (fresh out of school) wasn’t the way the world really worked. “I needed to slow down,” Henshaw said. He needed to figure out how to get people to do what he thought was the right way, and he came to realize that you can’t tell people. You need to collaborate with organizations and associations; let go of your ego; take advantage of opportunities, then interact with people; and build coalitions to then build your influence. Henshaw encouraged attendees not to accept status quo. “We need to be more transformational,” he said. He said to be active, be present and “. . . work with teams to engage people and be willing to compromise.” 

Foulke focused on gaining trust and that showing people that you have the knowledge to lead them will help you influence. “People have to believe in you,” he said. “Without trust, you can never have employee engagement.” He said that everyone has influence, but it’s not always easy to show it. “We have to be able to articulate the message to the C suite.” Foulke also agreed with Henshaw in that safety professionals need to be willing and able to collaborate. “Be focused on working with people,” Foulke said, “Be able to show your knowledge.” He added that the fact they were at Safety 2013 was a helpful step to gaining knowledge to become more influential. 

This Safety 2013 session was sponsored by ASSE's Government Affairs Committee.

Safety 2013 Interactive Research Poster Session Winners Announced

The winners of the Safety 2013 Interactive Research Poster Sessions have been announced. The sessions provide information to expand SH&E professionals’ skills, identify emerging industry issues and prepare of challenges in the SH&E field. New to this year’s conference were Interactive Research Poster Session Videos. Participants could have made a video summarizing their research, in addition to presenting their poster at the conference . Winners were selected for the following categories: Undergraduate Student, Graduate Student, Other (including faculty and government) and Top Video Entry.

Undergraduate student winner: “Characterizing the Potential Use of ANSI Class Z87.1 Safety Glasses for the Attenuation of UV Excimer Laser Exposure,” by Tina Wells, Maika Lee, Burton Ogle, Tracey Zontek, Western Carolina University, Scott Hollenbeck and John Jankovi. 

Graduate student winner: “Determining the Effective Exposure Control Measures to Safety & Health Hazards in the Offshore Oil & Gas Operations,” by Ana Ramirez, Najmeh Vaez, Maria Ricardo-Roca, Yi Wang and Magdy Akladios, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX. This paper focused on identifying and evaluating safety and health hazards in the offshore oil and gas industry, and to introduce different effective engineering, administrative and/or PPE control measures to prevent or mitigate the consequences of safety and health hazards on personnel.

Other (including faculty and government): “Lost-Time Injuries—Predicting & Reducing Their Occurance,” by Katherine E. Schofield Larson, Bruce H. Alexander, Susan Goodwin Gerberich, Richard MacLehose and Andrew D. Ryan, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota. This study aimed to determine the association between minor injury experience and risk of lost-time injury.

Top video entry winner: “Developing 24-Hour Noise Exposure Profiles & Determination of Shipboard Task Contributions to Overall Noise Dose,” by Gary A. Morris, Commander Jennifer Rous, Commander Michael Stevens, and student authors Justin Bryant, Amanda Dean and Carrie Stindt of Murray State University. This paper was a federal funded grant to determine 24-hour noise dose exposure to sailors working aboard naval aircraft carriers.